Hey, first about your essays. I have barely finished reading a third of the essays that came in. You can imagine the reasons why; the primary one being that this is the time of the term when the first of the major assignments from other classes also come in. I will try to get you the feedback at the earliest.
In the meanwhile, I have
updated the grades page, where you can check your progress--if you had provided me with a four-digit code. If you have not, and want to keep track as well, make sure to email me (not the class) a preferred four digit code for you, and that number ought not to be the last four of your SSN or V#.
This is also a neat way for you to make sure I have not made any data entry error.
My hope is that deciphering the evaluation that I have provided is simple; email me if I need to clarify.
I am delighted with your responses to Discussion Question 3. As much as international trade and transportation are market activities--largely governed by supply and demand--the reality is that there is extensive government involvement as well. Some of those are well discussed in other courses too--such as the subsidies and tariffs that governments might use in order to influence how competitive their own "domestic" production can be in the global market. But, I have opted to stay out of those aspects of trade and economic issues so that we can focus on the geographic aspects, particularly with the neat case of the "box." In other words, I want to remind you that there is a lot more extensive government involvement than we could discuss in DQ 3. (
My favorite complaint is discussed here.)
We can even take a step back in time and look at the
interstate system that was built. The trigger for that was Eisenhower's experience as a young army captain--In 1919 that Eisenhower participated in the army’s exercise to study the logistical issues in moving military vehicles and equipment from coast to coast, along the Lincoln Highway. It was this, together with his war-time experiences in Europe, which led Eisenhower to call for a national system of highways when he was elected to the presidency.
So, yes, there is that government/military/transport connection in the interstate system, too.
The container revolution was similarly catalyzed by the logistical demands of the Vietnam War, as you found out from Levinson's presentation. It is interesting, eh! So, yes, this too is an example of market-state partnership of sorts, even though they did not start working as partners with a fixed goal of sorts.
By the same token, even though governments might own the ports, the day-to-day operation could be contracted out to the market. This became a
huge controversy recently here in the US.
The efficiency gains from standardization of the "box" have been tremendous, as Levinson points out. This standardization might have eventually happened; but the government getting into it perhaps catalyzed an acceleration of the standardization. I mean, if you think about, pretty much most of the goods we use are standardized somehow, right?
We also notice that the takeoff stage of the diffusion process is highly related to the standardization time frame as well. Which sounds logical even to an intuitive understanding.
Finally, it appears that this term I am completely lost on the popular media references you folks are making ... First it was about a Bruce Willis movie, and then about "The Wire"... and now the Discovery Channel's program. Hmmm.... I have a lot to catch up on, eh .... maybe I can if I didn't have to grade essays :)
As always, feel free to post your rejoinders, questions, ....
I will get the next DQ out in the next couple of days
ps: if you read until here, you deserve another "groaner" ....
A woman had twins, and gave them up for adoption at birth.
One of the twins went to a family in Egypt, and was named "Amal." The other twin went to a family in Spain, and they named him "Juan."
Years later, Juan sent a picture of himself to his birth mother. Upon receiving the picture, she told her husband that she wished she also had a picture of Amal.
Her husband responded, "But they are twins. If you've seen Juan, you've seen Amal."
(read the italics aloud if you don't get the pun at first!!!)